Showing posts with label Westminster businesses parking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Westminster businesses parking. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Better Downtown Parking – Increasing the supply and managing it better…

 Better Downtown Parking – Increasing the supply and managing it better…

How This Report Will Help You Improve Downtown Parking By Laurence A. Alexander

Published by Downtown Research and Development Center ISBN 0-915910-25-X

December 1, 1987


Not long ago most downtowners thought "improving parking" meant getting more spaces, or getting free parking, or hopefully getting both.

Today many downtowners -- and all downtown planners and parking experts — know that there is far more to it than that.  I have been involved in more than one downtown where they had, in fact, excess parking, but business was still bad.  How does that happen?  Bad locations, poor rate and hour structures, careless maintenance and sloppy operations, long walking distances, hidden parking and many other factors can cause it.

A really good parking system consists of just the right number of parking spaces, strategically located relative to destinations, set up to serve both short-and long-term parking, priced right (not always free) and operated expertly.

This is not a cookbook showing how to get more parking.  That topic is addressed.  But more important, this book is designed to tell downtowners:

*  How to think right about downtown parking
*  How to plan a total parking system that meets all needs
*  How to get the right amount of parking;  not too few spaces nor too many (they are very expensive to develop and operate)
*  How to define your downtown parking goals and how to shape parking plans to reach them
*   
In addition, this book aims to alert downtowners to essential new ideas and concepts such as efficient shared-parking, standards for calculating demand, organizing free parking districts and other techniques, providing super-peak parking for special events and more.

Another basic idea covered relates to making all parking more productive -- a wonderful substitute for the staggering costs of building more lots or structures. Parking system management, as it is often called, does this.  It should be well-understood by all downtowners interested in CBD parking, business, economic growth and service to the public.


Free parking, management, relationship to transit, handling heavy employee parking loads, newest ideas and trends, metering or not-metering -- even the "ideal" parking system are all covered.  You should find this all extremely useful!
+++++++++++++++
Kevin Dayhoff is an artist - and a columnist for:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/kevindayhoffTwitpic: http://twitpic.com/photos/kevindayhoff
Kevin Dayhoff's The New Bedford Herald: http://kbetrue.livejournal.com/ = www.newbedfordherald.net

Tumblr: Kevin Dayhoff Banana Stems www.kevindayhoff.tumblr.com/
Smurfs: http://babylonfluckjudd.blogspot.com/
Google profile: https://profiles.google.com/kevindayhoff/

E-mail: kevindayhoff(at)gmail.com
My http://www.explorecarroll.com/ columns appear in the copy of the Baltimore Sunday Sun that is distributed in Carroll County: https://subscribe.baltsun.com/Circulation/
+++++++++++++++

Sunday, June 29, 2008

20080625 The hogs and parking meters of Westminster’s past history


The hogs and parking meters of Westminster’s past history

June 25th, 2008 by Kevin Dayhoff


Photo caption: Looking east on the south side Main Street of Westminster Maryland at St. John Catholic Church in the 1920s. The church was built in 1865. On June 19, 1952 the storm blew through town and toppled the steeple at 4:45 in the afternoon. As a result the structure was subsequently deemed unsafe in 1968.

The last church service was held on February 4, 1968. The structure was demolished in early March 1977 and replaced with the Westminster Branch of the Carroll County Public Library in March 1980. (The image is from an old file collection. The photographer is unknown. Kevin Dayhoff)

Writer’s note – a shorter version of this column appeared in the print edition of the Westminster Eagle on June 25, 2008.

June is “invasion month” in the city of Westminster. Over the years, a sampling of the invasions over the years has involved bugs, hogs, parking meters, dust, flies, manure, and Southern troops have made historic appearances in the city and caused quite a ruckus.

Ay caramba – where to begin?

Throughout history there have been many critter problems in Westminster, but none seems to have caused as much a stir as what to do with the city’s hog population.

Many thanks go to Laurel Taylor, the Westminster City Clerk who gave me a hand a while back in getting to the bottom of the controversies.

As early as October 1, 1860, an ordinance was enacted by the Westminster mayor and common council, which prohibited “the running at large of hogs and swine” in the city.

On October 9, 1860, “the price per head for the impoundment of errant swine was reduced from $2.00/head to $1.00/head. The daily fee for impoundment was reduced from $1.50 to $.50.”

The following year, on June 12, 1861 the minutes of the common council proceeding note: “Moved and seconded that the Ordinance relating to Hogs running at large in the City of Westminster be enforced and that after the 1st of July 1861 all hogs or swine found in the streets will be taken up and disposed of as directed by Ordinance heretofore (illegible - passed?) by the Board and that ....Joseph Shaw publish a Notice of the same to the Citizens of Westminster prior to 1st July 1861.”

Dogs running loose seem to have also been a problem because in 1866, an ordinance took effect that prohibited dogs from running at large in the City unless they were muzzled.

The minutes of the meeting at which that Ordinance was adopted contain a warning: “Attention is hereby called to the Ordinance already existing relative to swine running at large, which will be rigidly enforced.”

However, the problems associated with hogs persisted and in October 1895 a special council meeting was called after “Dr. J. Howell Billingslea and a committee of citizens who went before them to urge immediate action in the interest of the public health,” according to an October 12, 1895 article in the now defunct American Sentinel newspaper.

The newspaper article noted that Dr. Billingslea was “convinced that the hog pens, even when kept as clean as possible, are disease breeders and a constant menace to the health of the people in towns of any considerable size, a fact about which there can hardly be a dispute…

“January 1st, 1896, is spoken of as the period at which the prohibition will likely go into effect. While such a measure will work hardship, probably in many cases, it seems to be necessary to the preservation of the health of the community.”

The article did not go into detail as to what “hardships” would occur.

In June 1946 another controversy erupted in downtown Westminster – parking meters.

On May 24, 1946, the now defunct Democratic Advocate reported that parking meters “from Charles Carroll Hotel to Anchor street, (became) a reality Tuesday morning when a force of men started drilling holes for the erection of the meters.”

The proposal by the city to install parking meters was quite controversial and the subject of litigation. However, the newspaper reported, “The injunction was denied by Judge Clarke, some time last April, and an appeal was under way but later dropped by the opposers…

“Charles Armacost, popular contractor of Finksburg, has charge of the placing the meters in position. The work is being done very rapidly.”

Of course, parking in downtown Westminster ebbs and flows in controversy. I can recall more than a few spirited conversations about the parking meters well into the late 1950s and 60s.

For many of us, one enigma remains and that is why parking was removed from the south side of Main Street in front of where the downtown branch of the Carroll County library is located.

Many of us who grew up in Westminster recall parking on that side of the street – in front of where St. John Catholic Church was then located. The came along “progress” and a center turn lane – that is hardly ever used - was added for the entire block and the parking removed.

Nevertheless, in spite of the critter challenges and the parking meters, the city has survived. Whether we will survive the city’s current “tax, borrow, and spend” initiatives remains to be seen.



Kevin Dayhoff writes from Westminster Maryland USA.
E-mail him at:
kdayhoff@carr.org
####

www.kevindayhoff.net
http://www.youtube.com/kevindayhoff
http://kbetrue.livejournal.com/
http://gizmosart.com/dayhoff.html
Blog Net News Maryland: http://www.blognetnews.com/Maryland/feed.php?channel=33

E-mail him at:
kdayhoff AT carr.org or kevindayhoff AT gmail.com

His columns and articles appear in The Tentacle -
www.thetentacle.com; Westminster Eagle Opinion; www.thewestminstereagle.com, Winchester Report and The Sunday Carroll Eagle – in the Sunday Carroll County section of the Baltimore Sun. Get Westminster Eagle RSS Feed

“When I stop working the rest of the day is posthumous. I'm only really alive when I'm writing.” Tennessee Williams

20080625 The hogs and parking meters of Westminster’s past history
20080625 The hogs and parking meters of Westminster’s past history

20080625 The hogs and parking meters of Westminster’s past history

The hogs and parking meters of Westminster’s past history

June 25th, 2008 by Kevin Dayhoff

Photo caption: Looking east on the south side Main Street of Westminster Maryland at St. John Catholic Church in the 1920s. The church was built in 1865. On June 19, 1952 the storm blew through town and toppled the steeple at 4:45 in the afternoon. As a result the structure was subsequently deemed unsafe in 1968.

The last church service was held on February 4, 1968. The structure was demolished in early March 1977 and replaced with the Westminster Branch of the Carroll County Public Library in March 1980. (The image is from an old file collection. The photographer is unknown. Kevin Dayhoff)

Writer’s note – a shorter version of this column appeared in the print edition of the Westminster Eagle on June 25, 2008.

_____

June is “invasion month” in the city of Westminster. Over the years, a sampling of the invasions over the years has involved bugs, hogs, parking meters, dust, flies, manure, and Southern troops have made historic appearances in the city and caused quite a ruckus.

Ay caramba – where to begin?

Throughout history there have been many critter problems in Westminster, but none seems to have caused as much a stir as what to do with the city’s hog population.

Many thanks go to Laurel Taylor, the Westminster City Clerk who gave me a hand a while back in getting to the bottom of the controversies.

As early as October 1, 1860, an ordinance was enacted by the Westminster mayor and common council, which prohibited “the running at large of hogs and swine” in the city.

On October 9, 1860, “the price per head for the impoundment of errant swine was reduced from $2.00/head to $1.00/head. The daily fee for impoundment was reduced from $1.50 to $.50.”

The following year, on June 12, 1861 the minutes of the common council proceeding note: “Moved and seconded that the Ordinance relating to Hogs running at large in the City of Westminster be enforced and that after the 1st of July 1861 all hogs or swine found in the streets will be taken up and disposed of as directed by Ordinance heretofore (illegible - passed?) by the Board and that ....Joseph Shaw publish a Notice of the same to the Citizens of Westminster prior to 1st July 1861.”

Dogs running loose seem to have also been a problem because in 1866, an ordinance took effect that prohibited dogs from running at large in the City unless they were muzzled.

The minutes of the meeting at which that Ordinance was adopted contain a warning: “Attention is hereby called to the Ordinance already existing relative to swine running at large, which will be rigidly enforced.”

However, the problems associated with hogs persisted and in October 1895 a special council meeting was called after “Dr. J. Howell Billingslea and a committee of citizens who went before them to urge immediate action in the interest of the public health,” according to an October 12, 1895 article in the now defunct American Sentinel newspaper.

The newspaper article noted that Dr. Billingslea was “convinced that the hog pens, even when kept as clean as possible, are disease breeders and a constant menace to the health of the people in towns of any considerable size, a fact about which there can hardly be a dispute…

“January 1st, 1896, is spoken of as the period at which the prohibition will likely go into effect. While such a measure will work hardship, probably in many cases, it seems to be necessary to the preservation of the health of the community.”

The article did not go into detail as to what “hardships” would occur.

In June 1946 another controversy erupted in downtown Westminster – parking meters.

On May 24, 1946, the now defunct Democratic Advocate reported that parking meters “from Charles Carroll Hotel to Anchor street, (became) a reality Tuesday morning when a force of men started drilling holes for the erection of the meters.”

The proposal by the city to install parking meters was quite controversial and the subject of litigation. However, the newspaper reported, “The injunction was denied by Judge Clarke, some time last April, and an appeal was under way but later dropped by the opposers…

“Charles Armacost, popular contractor of Finksburg, has charge of the placing the meters in position. The work is being done very rapidly.”

Of course, parking in downtown Westminster ebbs and flows in controversy. I can recall more than a few spirited conversations about the parking meters well into the late 1950s and 60s.

For many of us, one enigma remains and that is why parking was removed from the south side of Main Street in front of where the downtown branch of the Carroll County library is located.

Many of us who grew up in Westminster recall parking on that side of the street – in front of where St. John Catholic Church was then located. The came along “progress” and a center turn lane – that is hardly ever used - was added for the entire block and the parking removed.

Nevertheless, in spite of the critter challenges and the parking meters, the city has survived. Whether we will survive the city’s current “tax, borrow, and spend” initiatives remains to be seen.


####

Kevin Dayhoff writes from Westminster Maryland USA.
E-mail him at:
kdayhoff@carr.org
####

www.kevindayhoff.net
http://www.youtube.com/kevindayhoff
http://kbetrue.livejournal.com/
http://gizmosart.com/dayhoff.html
Blog Net News Maryland: http://www.blognetnews.com/Maryland/feed.php?channel=33

E-mail him at:
kdayhoff AT carr.org or kevindayhoff AT gmail.com

His columns and articles appear in The Tentacle -
www.thetentacle.com; Westminster Eagle Opinion; www.thewestminstereagle.com, Winchester Report and The Sunday Carroll Eagle – in the Sunday Carroll County section of the Baltimore Sun. Get Westminster Eagle RSS Feed

“When I stop working the rest of the day is posthumous. I'm only really alive when I'm writing.” Tennessee Williams

20080625 The hogs and parking meters of Westminster’s past history

20080625 The hogs and parking meters of Westminster’s past history

Saturday, May 24, 2008

19460524 Parking Meters A Reality

19460524 Parking Meters A Reality

Parking Meters A Reality

Democratic Advocate, May 24, 1946

The Mayor and Council, who had under consideration parking meters for Main street, both sides, from Charles Carroll Hotel to Anchor street, was a reality Tuesday morning when a force of men started drilling holes for the erection of the meters.

It will require about two weeks or more before the work will be completed. Experts in the line of work are employed to complete the job.

The injunction was denied by Judge Clarke, some time last April, and an appeal was under way but later dropped by the opposers.

The meters will become the property of the City corporation, after a certain percentage of the receipts from the meters reach the valuation under the signed contract.

The City Corporation pay no money to the meter corporation. The debt is paid in revenue received through the meters.

The parking meters are in operation for 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., except Saturday, the time is 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. Sundays and holidays no restriction as to time.

On another page of this issue there will be a diagram with description of how the meters operate. Charles Armacost, popular contractor of Finksburg, has charge of the placing the meters in position. The work is being done very rapidly.


Democratic Advocate, May 24, 1946.

Westminster Scrapbook Main St

Westminster Businesses parking

History Westminster

History This Day in History

History Westminster 1940s

Friday, November 22, 2002

20021120 Westminster Downtown Parking Report

20021120 Westminster Downtown Parking Report

CITY OF WESTMINSTER, MARYLAND

Report and Recommendations

November 20, 2002

Advisory Task Force Committee

On

Downtown Westminster Parking

City of Westminster

P.O. Box 710 City Hall

Westminster, Maryland 21158

I. Introduction:

At its meeting of March 11, 2002, The Mayor and Common Council of Westminster unanimously established the Downtown Parking Advisory Committee. Thereafter, on June 4, 2002, Councilman Gregory Pecoraro convened the Downtown Parking Advisory Committee. The committee consisted of downtown business and property owners which were charged with reviewing the City’s parking structure and making preliminary recommendations to The Mayor and Common Council. The area under review by the Downtown Parking Advisory Committee is highlighted in Attachment 1. The following persons were appointed to the Committee.

Downtown Parking Advisory Task Force Committee:

Greg Pecoraro

David Max

Audrey Cimino

Craig Scott

Tom Ferguson

Lynn Aaron

Tom Beyard

Edward Gottleib

Stan Ruchlewicz

Kevin Bell

Maj. Dean Brewer

Mark Pohlhaus



II. Background Information:

The Committee was charged with finding creative ways to increase the parking revenue stream with the development of a five to ten year plan covering parking management, parking rates, access and related issues. At its first meeting, Councilman Pecoraro outlined the work to be undertaken by the parking committee. The first task the Parking Committee requested of staff was to establish a current parking inventory as well as to conduct a survey of the businesses within the study area inquiring about the number of employees and usage of public and private parking areas. A sample questionnaire is enclosed as Attachment 2. Table 1 provides a summary of the current parking inventory in Downtown Westminster. It shows a total of 3,727 public and private parking spaces within the study area. Of those, 1,906 are public parking spaces comprised permits, meter and free parking. The remaining parking spaces are privately controlled parking spaces. Table 2 provides a summary of the survey that was conducted, which utilized face-to-face interviews of the businesses that chose to participate in the survey. The response rate for the survey was 85% of all businesses within the study area.

Table 1

Downtown Parking Inventory


Total Parking Capacity

Number




Free Spaces

2551




Meters

524




Handicapped Spaces

88




Permit Spaces

529




Service Parking

35




Total*

3727




* Calculated by adding Total Public Spaces – 1,906 and Total Private Spaces – 1,821. Does not

include the addition of the Longwell Parking Garage or Westminster Square Garage











Table 2

Downtown Parking Survey Summary Tables





Type of Business

Number of Employees

# Off Street Spaces


FT

PT


Non Professional Service

134

64

139

Professional Service

339

125

336

Restaurant

71

39

60

Retail

33

32

32

Other

284

110

149

Total

861

370

716*

Total Employees

1,231



* Number of spaces provided for employee and patron use.

Table 2 (cont.)

Type of Business

# Permits Employer Purchase

# Permits Employees Purchase

Meter Subsidies

Non Professional Service

27

3

4

Professional Service

31

30

5

Restaurant

0

1

0

Retail

15

0

0

Other

31

79

1

Total

104

113

10


III. Committee Recommendations:

Based upon these results, the Committee directed staff to develop a parking strategy for the overall study area. This included defining “Guiding Principles” which would establish benchmarks for the Committee to consider while making its pricing recommendations. Those principles are as follows:

A. Parking Committee 2002

Guiding Principles

1. Preserve the City’s parking memo fund as a self-sustaining fund within the City’s general fund.

2. Establish charges for permit, payment on foot and metered parking that, over time, will provide sufficient revenue to cover the cost of: a) construction, operation and maintenance of parking spaces; and b) construction of additional parking spaces in the future.

3. Establish consistent fines for parking violations that, over time, will provide sufficient revenue to cover the personnel, operating and capital cost of parking enforcement.

4. Implement a progressive enforcement system that may include a warning for a first time offense and an increasing fine structure for repeat and habitual offenders.

5. Establish charges for permit, payment on foot and metered parking that direct and encourage customers and short-term parkers to use the most desirable and convenient spaces closest to the commercial core and encourage employees and long-term parkers to use permit spaces.

6. Establish charges for permit, payment on foot and metered parking that recognize that some City parking facilities are more desirable and convenient than others and should be priced differently to encourage their use and discourage their misuse.

7. Provide a variety of parking choices for customers, employees and others that take into consideration location, pricing and the differing needs of short-term and long-term users.

8. Provide a variety of parking payment choices for customers, employees and others that may include cash, credit and debit cards, pre-paid parking cards and related methods.

9. Provide clear and concise signing to direct users to City parking facilities.

10. Implement improved parking enforcement by utilizing better equipment and tactics, with the consideration of adding more enforcement personnel as needed.

11. Assure the maximum safety for the users of City parking facilities.

12. Recognize with the construction and increased capacity created by the construction of the Longwell and Westminster Square Parking Garages that some City surface parking facilities that are less convenient or in key geographic locations may have higher and better uses as development sites and could be redeveloped in the future to generate additional commercial space and tax base.

Additionally, the Committee determined a new pricing structure for meters, permits, pay on foot and violations. The Committee also recognized the need to upgrade the parking meters in Westminster. After much discussion, the Committee recommended the replacement of all meters with digital meters in FY 03-04. In addition to replacement meters, the Committee recommended that the City purchase new enforcement software and ticket dispensing machines which would make enforcement more efficient. After discussing the rate structure with the parking committee, the Committee recommends the following rate structure.

B. Rate Structure – Permits

Permitted Parking Lots FY 03-04 to FY 07-08*

Longwell Annex (formerly Key St. Lot) @$0.00/month

Lower Conaway Lot @$25/month

Upper Conaway Lot @$20/month

Chapel Lot @ $20/month

North Longwell Lot @$25/month

Bauerlein @$20/month


*Assumes the Conaway Lot will be redeveloped in FY 06-07

Permitted Parking Lots FY 08-09 to FY 12-13

Longwell Annex (formerly Key St. Lot) @$10/month

Chapel Lot $30/month

North Longwell Lot @$35/month

Bauerlein @$30/month


Permitted Parking Lots FY 13-14 to FY 17-18

Longwell Annex (formerly Key St. Lot) @$20/month

Chapel Lot $40/month

North Longwell Lot @$45/month

Bauerlein @$40/month


Permitted Parking Lots FY 18-19 to FY 22-23

Longwell Annex (formerly Key St. Lot) @$30/month

Chapel Lot $50/month

North Longwell Lot @$55/month

Bauerlein @$50/month


C. Rate Structure – Pay on Foot

Pay on Foot Rates FY 03-04 to FY 07-08

Longwell Parking Garage @$30/month

Westminster Square Parking Garage @$30/month


Pay on Foot Rates FY 08-09 to FY 12-13

Longwell Parking Garage @$40/month

Westminster Square Parking Garage @$40/month


Pay on Foot Rates 13-14 to FY 17-18

Longwell Parking Garage @$50/month

Westminster Square Parking Garage @$50/month


Pay on Foot Rates FY 18-19 to FY 22-23

Longwell Parking Garage @$60/month

Westminster Square Parking Garage @$60/month


D. Rate Structure – Violations

Violations FY 03-04 to FY 07-08*

Meters @$15/violation

Permit Violations @$15/violation

Other Summons @$30/violation


Violations FY 08-09 to FY 12-13*

Meters @$20/violation

Permit Violations @$20/violation

Other Summons @$35violation


Violations FY 13-14 to FY 17-18*

Meters @$25/violation

Permit Violations @$25/violation

Other Summons @$40violation


Violations FY 18-19 to FY 22-23*

Meters @$30/violation

Permit Violations @$30/violation

Other Summons @$45violation


* Assumes a uniform violation structure for meter violations. Committee recommended that the City employ a progressive violation fine structure dependent upon the number of violations received within a given time frame. (i.e. first violation – warning, second violation - $15 fine, etc…)

E. Rate Structure – Meters

Meter Rates FY 03-04 to FY 07-08

Location

Sherwood Lot - 95 meters @ $.50/hour

Albion Lot - 18 meters @ $.50/hour

Chapel Lot - 9 meters @$.50/hour

Sentinel Lot - 12 meters @$.50/hour

Gehr Lot - 21 meters @$.50/hour

Davis Lot - 14 meters @$.50/hour

Babylon Lot - 34 meters @$.50/hour

Diffendal Lot - 21 meters @$.50/hour

East Main Street - 128 meters @ $.50/hour

West Main Street - 54 meters @ $.50/hour

North Court Street - 30 meters @$.50/hour

Court Place - 4 meters @ $.50/hour

Bond Street - 6 meters @ $.50/hour

Anchor Street - 10 meters @$.50/hour

PA Avenue - 7 meters @$.50/hour


Meter Rates FY 08-09 to FY 12-13

Location

Sherwood Lot - 95 meters @ $.75/hour

Albion Lot - 18 meters @ $.75/hour

Chapel Lot - 9 meters @$.75/hour

Sentinel Lot - 12 meters @$.75/hour

Gehr Lot - 21 meters @$.75/hour

Davis Lot - 14 meters @$.75/hour

Babylon Lot - 34 meters @$.75/hour

Diffendal Lot - 21 meters @$.75/hour

East Main Street - 128 meters @ $.75/hour

West Main Street - 54 meters @ $.75/hour

North Court Street - 30 meters @$.75/hour

Court Place - 4 meters @ $.75/hour

Bond Street - 6 meters @ $.75/hour

Anchor Street - 10 meters @$.75/hour

PA Avenue - 7 meters @$.75/hour


Meter Rates FY 13-14 to FY 17-18

Location

Sherwood Lot - 95 meters @ $1.00/hour

Albion Lot - 18 meters @ $1.00/hour

Chapel Lot - 9 meters @$1.00/hour

Sentinel Lot - 12 meters @$1.00/hour

Gehr Lot - 21 meters @$1.00/hour

Davis Lot - 14 meters @$1.00/hour

Babylon Lot - 34 meters @$1.00/hour

Diffendal Lot - 21 meters @$1.00/hour

East Main Street - 128 meters @ $1.00/hour

West Main Street - 54 meters @ $1.00/hour

North Court Street - 30 meters @$1.00/hour

Court Place - 4 meters @ $1.00/hour

Bond Street - 6 meters @ $1.00/hour

Anchor Street - 10 meters @$1.00/hour

PA Avenue - 7 meters @$1.00/hour


Meter Rates FY 18-19 to FY 22-23

Location

Sherwood Lot - 95 meters @ $1.00/hour

Albion Lot - 18 meters @ $1.00/hour

Chapel Lot - 9 meters @$1.00/hour

Sentinel Lot - 12 meters @$1.00/hour

Gehr Lot - 21 meters @$1.00/hour

Davis Lot - 14 meters @$1.00/hour

Babylon Lot - 34 meters @$1.00/hour

Diffendal Lot - 21 meters @$1.00/hour

East Main Street - 128 meters @ $1.00/hour

West Main Street - 54 meters @ $1.00/hour

North Court Street - 30 meters @$1.00/hour

Court Place - 4 meters @ $1.00/hour

Bond Street - 6 meters @ $1.00/hour

Anchor Street - 10 meters @$1.00/hour

PA Avenue - 7 meters @$1.00/hour


The Committee recommends that the City replace all meters in FY 03-04. At that time, the Committee recommends that the hours of meter enforcement be extended by three hours from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The current hours of enforcement are 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The recommended meters to install are digital and will be able to accept multiple forms of payment. The Committee also recommended that the City utilize a seven (7) year lease/purchase option which would minimize the initial capital cost. City staff is currently seeking lease/purchase proposals from local lending institutions. As information becomes available with respect to meter usage, the Committee recommends that the City annually review its meter rate structure.

The development of the above pricing structure achieves the goals of principles five, six and seven in the Guiding Principles. This pricing structure recognizes that some spaces are more desirable than others and they are priced to encourage employees and long-term parkers to park in the less convenient locations for a reduced cost. This pricing structure is also sensitive to the various types of customers that use parking in the downtown area and financial incentives have been built in to recognize the variety of choices that are necessary to accommodate all of Westminster’s parking customers. This parking structure also recognizes that some parking facilities are less convenient or in key geographic locations and may have a higher and better use as commercial sites and could be redeveloped in the future to generate additional commercial space and tax base.

Attachment 3 is a detailed cost/revenue analysis of the parking memo fund if the City were to implement these recommendations beginning in FY03-04. This analysis assumes that the Parking Memo Fund will start with a zero balance in FY 03-04 and some assumptions had to be made with respect to costs. Specifically, the cost of the meter replacement program is not based on a bid package; rather, it is based on estimates provided by vendors of this equipment.

These estimates have an assumed usage rate. For instance, it is assumed within this detailed cost/revenue analysis that 50% of the parking spaces within the Longwell Parking Garage will generate $30/month during the first five fiscal years. Similar adjustments have been made to all surface parking lots and meters as well. Revenue projections for City meters are based on nine hours of customers paying for metered parking.

As indicated in Attachment 3, the parking pricing structure has been established to cover all costs associated with parking as well as provide for additional revenues in the future so that additional parking structures can be constructed. If adopted as recommended by the Committee, the Parking Memo Fund will become self sufficient in FY 08-09. However, this fund will carry a negative balance forward until FY 10-11 as forwarded to The Mayor and Common Council for its consideration. Incidentally, at the end of the twenty (20) year cycle which is covered by this analysis, enough revenue would be generated to substantially cover the cost of constructing a new parking structure.

F. Increased Signage

The Committee also recommends that the City initiate an aggressive signage campaign to direct parking users to the designated parking facilities. In response to that, the Committee has recommended that the City budget $10,000 to cover the cost of placing signs in strategic locations to direct traffic to the City’s parking facilities.G. EnforcementThe Committee recognizes that enforcement is critical to ensure that the City’s parking facilities achieve maximum efficiency in usage. Therefore, in conjunction with the meter replacement program, the Committee recommends that the City purchase new enforcement software which would allow the City to design a progressive violation enforcement system which more severely penalizes repeat and habitual offenders of the parking facilities. This system would also be a more efficient system, as issuing violations would be less labor intensive than it is currently.

F. Enforcement

The Committee recognizes that enforcement is critical to ensure that the City’s parking facilities achieve maximum efficiency in usage. Therefore, in conjunction with the meter replacement program, the Committee recommends that the City purchase new enforcement software which would allow the City to design a progressive violation enforcement system which more severely penalizes repeat and habitual offenders of the parking facilities. This system would also be a more efficient system, as issuing violations would be less labor intensive than it is currently.

H. Future Capacity

The Committee recommends that the City consider providing additional parking structures in the downtown area as the Downtown area continues to grow in the future. Based upon the proposed pricing structure, it is anticipated that the City would generate enough revenue to construct another parking garage in the future similar to the Longwell Parking Garage.

IV. Summary

The Committee proudly submits these recommendations to The Mayor and Common Council for its consideration. The Committee feels that these recommendations will achieve the goals adopted by the Committee as their Guiding Principles.